2000 Ford TS-50 vs. 1967 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 2000 Ford TS-50 is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1967 Nissan Cedric is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford TS-50 (128 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 14 more horse power than 1967 Nissan Cedric. (114 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford TS-50 should accelerate faster than 1967 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Nissan Cedric weights approximately 82 kg more than 2000 Ford TS-50.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford TS-50 (175 Nm) has 9 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Nissan Cedric. (166 Nm). This means 2000 Ford TS-50 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Ford TS-50 | 1967 Nissan Cedric | |
| Make | Ford | Nissan |
| Model | TS-50 | Cedric |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1967 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1989 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 128 HP | 114 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 175 Nm | 166 Nm |
| Vehicle Weight | 1208 kg | 1290 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2700 mm |
