2000 Ford TS-50 vs. 1968 Volvo 145
To start off, 2000 Ford TS-50 is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Volvo 145. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Volvo 145 would be higher. At 1,989 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Ford TS-50 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford TS-50 (128 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 26 more horse power than 1968 Volvo 145. (102 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford TS-50 should accelerate faster than 1968 Volvo 145. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Volvo 145 weights approximately 82 kg more than 2000 Ford TS-50.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford TS-50 (175 Nm) has 22 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Volvo 145. (153 Nm). This means 2000 Ford TS-50 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Volvo 145.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Ford TS-50 | 1968 Volvo 145 | |
Make | Ford | Volvo |
Model | TS-50 | 145 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1989 cc | 1778 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 128 HP | 102 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 175 Nm | 153 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1208 kg | 1290 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2620 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 45 L |