2000 Ford TS-50 vs. 1969 Holden Belmont
To start off, 2000 Ford TS-50 is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Holden Belmont. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Holden Belmont would be higher. At 5,025 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Holden Belmont is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Holden Belmont (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 80 more horse power than 2000 Ford TS-50. (128 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1969 Holden Belmont should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford TS-50. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Holden Belmont weights approximately 147 kg more than 2000 Ford TS-50. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1969 Holden Belmont (410 Nm) has 235 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford TS-50. (175 Nm). This means 1969 Holden Belmont will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford TS-50.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Ford TS-50 | 1969 Holden Belmont | |
Make | Ford | Holden |
Model | TS-50 | Belmont |
Year Released | 2000 | 1969 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1989 cc | 5025 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 128 HP | 208 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 175 Nm | 410 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1208 kg | 1355 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2830 mm |