2000 Ford TS-50 vs. 1972 Rover P5B
To start off, 2000 Ford TS-50 is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Rover P5B. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Rover P5B would be higher. At 3,528 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 Rover P5B is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Rover P5B (158 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 2000 Ford TS-50. (128 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1972 Rover P5B should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford TS-50. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Rover P5B weights approximately 382 kg more than 2000 Ford TS-50. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1972 Rover P5B (295 Nm) has 120 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford TS-50. (175 Nm). This means 1972 Rover P5B will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford TS-50.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Ford TS-50 | 1972 Rover P5B | |
| Make | Ford | Rover |
| Model | TS-50 | P5B |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1972 |
| Engine Size | 1989 cc | 3528 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 128 HP | 158 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 175 Nm | 295 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1208 kg | 1590 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2820 mm |
