2000 Ford TS-50 vs. 1975 Datsun 280Z
To start off, 2000 Ford TS-50 is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Datsun 280Z. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Datsun 280Z would be higher. At 2,753 cc (6 cylinders), 1975 Datsun 280Z is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1975 Datsun 280Z (150 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 22 more horse power than 2000 Ford TS-50. (128 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1975 Datsun 280Z should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford TS-50. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford TS-50 weights approximately 8 kg more than 1975 Datsun 280Z.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1975 Datsun 280Z (221 Nm) has 46 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford TS-50. (175 Nm). This means 1975 Datsun 280Z will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford TS-50.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Ford TS-50 | 1975 Datsun 280Z | |
| Make | Ford | Datsun |
| Model | TS-50 | 280Z |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1975 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1989 cc | 2753 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 128 HP | 150 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 175 Nm | 221 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1208 kg | 1200 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2304 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 60 L |
