2000 Ford TS-50 vs. 1976 Mazda RX-4
To start off, 2000 Ford TS-50 is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Mazda RX-4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Mazda RX-4 would be higher. At 2,616 cc, 1976 Mazda RX-4 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford TS-50 (128 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 14 more horse power than 1976 Mazda RX-4. (114 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford TS-50 should accelerate faster than 1976 Mazda RX-4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford TS-50 weights approximately 98 kg more than 1976 Mazda RX-4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford TS-50 (175 Nm) has 10 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Mazda RX-4. (165 Nm). This means 2000 Ford TS-50 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Mazda RX-4.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Ford TS-50 | 1976 Mazda RX-4 | |
| Make | Ford | Mazda |
| Model | TS-50 | RX-4 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1976 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1989 cc | 2616 cc |
| Engine Type | V | dual-disk rotary |
| Horse Power | 128 HP | 114 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 175 Nm | 165 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1208 kg | 1110 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2520 mm |
