2000 Ford TS-50 vs. 1984 Renault 25
To start off, 2000 Ford TS-50 is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Renault 25. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Renault 25 would be higher. At 2,165 cc (4 cylinders), 1984 Renault 25 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford TS-50 (128 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 6 more horse power than 1984 Renault 25. (122 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford TS-50 should accelerate faster than 1984 Renault 25. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford TS-50 weights approximately 8 kg more than 1984 Renault 25. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1984 Renault 25 (193 Nm) has 18 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford TS-50. (175 Nm). This means 1984 Renault 25 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford TS-50.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Ford TS-50 | 1984 Renault 25 | |
| Make | Ford | Renault |
| Model | TS-50 | 25 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1984 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1989 cc | 2165 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 128 HP | 122 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Torque | 175 Nm | 193 Nm |
| Vehicle Weight | 1208 kg | 1200 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2730 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 34 L |
