2000 Ford TS-50 vs. 1986 Mitsubishi Debonair

To start off, 2000 Ford TS-50 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Mitsubishi Debonair. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Mitsubishi Debonair would be higher. At 2,971 cc (6 cylinders), 1986 Mitsubishi Debonair is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Mitsubishi Debonair (153 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 2000 Ford TS-50. (128 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1986 Mitsubishi Debonair should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford TS-50. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Mitsubishi Debonair weights approximately 252 kg more than 2000 Ford TS-50. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2000 Ford TS-50 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Ford TS-50. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Mitsubishi Debonair, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1986 Mitsubishi Debonair (234 Nm) has 59 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford TS-50. (175 Nm). This means 1986 Mitsubishi Debonair will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford TS-50.

Compare all specifications: