2000 Ford TS-50 vs. 1986 Peugeot 505
To start off, 2000 Ford TS-50 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Peugeot 505. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Peugeot 505 would be higher. At 2,849 cc (6 cylinders), 1986 Peugeot 505 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Peugeot 505 (170 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 42 more horse power than 2000 Ford TS-50. (128 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1986 Peugeot 505 should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford TS-50. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Peugeot 505 weights approximately 123 kg more than 2000 Ford TS-50. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1986 Peugeot 505 (235 Nm) has 60 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford TS-50. (175 Nm). This means 1986 Peugeot 505 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford TS-50.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Ford TS-50 | 1986 Peugeot 505 | |
| Make | Ford | Peugeot |
| Model | TS-50 | 505 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1986 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1989 cc | 2849 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 128 HP | 170 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 175 Nm | 235 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1208 kg | 1331 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2680 mm |
