2000 Ford TS-50 vs. 1986 Volvo 245
To start off, 2000 Ford TS-50 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Volvo 245. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Volvo 245 would be higher. At 1,989 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Ford TS-50 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford TS-50 (128 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 32 more horse power than 1986 Volvo 245. (96 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford TS-50 should accelerate faster than 1986 Volvo 245.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford TS-50 (175 Nm) has 18 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Volvo 245. (157 Nm). This means 2000 Ford TS-50 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Volvo 245. 2000 Ford TS-50 has automatic transmission and 1986 Volvo 245 has manual transmission. 1986 Volvo 245 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Ford TS-50 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Ford TS-50 | 1986 Volvo 245 | |
| Make | Ford | Volvo |
| Model | TS-50 | 245 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1986 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1989 cc | 1986 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 128 HP | 96 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Torque | 175 Nm | 157 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2660 mm |
