2000 Ford TS-50 vs. 1988 Ford Thunderbird
To start off, 2000 Ford TS-50 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1988 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1988 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 1988 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1988 Ford Thunderbird (138 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 2000 Ford TS-50. (128 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1988 Ford Thunderbird should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford TS-50. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1988 Ford Thunderbird weights approximately 402 kg more than 2000 Ford TS-50. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1988 Ford Thunderbird (291 Nm) has 116 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford TS-50. (175 Nm). This means 1988 Ford Thunderbird will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford TS-50.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Ford TS-50 | 1988 Ford Thunderbird | |
| Make | Ford | Ford |
| Model | TS-50 | Thunderbird |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1988 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1989 cc | 3791 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 128 HP | 138 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 3800 RPM |
| Torque | 175 Nm | 291 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1208 kg | 1610 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2880 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 45 L |
