2000 Ford TS-50 vs. 1988 Renault Megane
To start off, 2000 Ford TS-50 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1988 Renault Megane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1988 Renault Megane would be higher. At 2,999 cc (6 cylinders), 1988 Renault Megane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1988 Renault Megane (250 HP) has 122 more horse power than 2000 Ford TS-50. (128 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1988 Renault Megane should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford TS-50.
Because 2000 Ford TS-50 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Ford TS-50. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1988 Renault Megane, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1988 Renault Megane (181 Nm) has 6 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford TS-50. (175 Nm). This means 1988 Renault Megane will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford TS-50. 2000 Ford TS-50 has automatic transmission and 1988 Renault Megane has manual transmission. 1988 Renault Megane will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Ford TS-50 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Ford TS-50 | 1988 Renault Megane | |
Make | Ford | Renault |
Model | TS-50 | Megane |
Year Released | 2000 | 1988 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1989 cc | 2999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 128 HP | 250 HP |
Torque | 175 Nm | 181 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |