2000 Ford TS-50 vs. 1992 Mercury Villager
To start off, 2000 Ford TS-50 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Mercury Villager. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Mercury Villager would be higher. At 2,960 cc (6 cylinders), 1992 Mercury Villager is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Mercury Villager (149 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 21 more horse power than 2000 Ford TS-50. (128 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1992 Mercury Villager should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford TS-50. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Mercury Villager weights approximately 592 kg more than 2000 Ford TS-50. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2000 Ford TS-50 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Ford TS-50. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Mercury Villager, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Ford TS-50 | 1992 Mercury Villager | |
Make | Ford | Mercury |
Model | TS-50 | Villager |
Year Released | 2000 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1989 cc | 2960 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 128 HP | 149 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1208 kg | 1800 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2860 mm |