2000 Ford TS-50 vs. 1994 Mercedes-Benz C
To start off, 2000 Ford TS-50 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Mercedes-Benz C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Mercedes-Benz C would be higher. At 3,606 cc (6 cylinders), 1994 Mercedes-Benz C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Mercedes-Benz C (277 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 149 more horse power than 2000 Ford TS-50. (128 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1994 Mercedes-Benz C should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford TS-50. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1994 Mercedes-Benz C weights approximately 317 kg more than 2000 Ford TS-50. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1994 Mercedes-Benz C (385 Nm) has 210 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford TS-50. (175 Nm). This means 1994 Mercedes-Benz C will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford TS-50.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Ford TS-50 | 1994 Mercedes-Benz C | |
Make | Ford | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | TS-50 | C |
Year Released | 2000 | 1994 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1989 cc | 3606 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 128 HP | 277 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5750 RPM |
Torque | 175 Nm | 385 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1208 kg | 1525 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 55 L |