2000 Ford TS-50 vs. 1994 Mitsubishi FTO
To start off, 2000 Ford TS-50 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Mitsubishi FTO. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Mitsubishi FTO would be higher. At 1,996 cc (6 cylinders), 1994 Mitsubishi FTO is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Mitsubishi FTO (197 HP @ 7500 RPM) has 69 more horse power than 2000 Ford TS-50. (128 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1994 Mitsubishi FTO should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford TS-50.
2000 Ford TS-50 has automatic transmission and 1994 Mitsubishi FTO has manual transmission. 1994 Mitsubishi FTO will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Ford TS-50 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Ford TS-50 | 1994 Mitsubishi FTO | |
| Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
| Model | TS-50 | FTO |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1994 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1989 cc | 1996 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 128 HP | 197 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 7500 RPM |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2510 mm |
