2000 Ford TS-50 vs. 1996 Mercedes-Benz F200
To start off, 2000 Ford TS-50 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mercedes-Benz F200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mercedes-Benz F200 would be higher. At 5,987 cc (12 cylinders), 1996 Mercedes-Benz F200 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Mercedes-Benz F200 (408 HP) has 280 more horse power than 2000 Ford TS-50. (128 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Mercedes-Benz F200 should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford TS-50. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Mercedes-Benz F200 weights approximately 197 kg more than 2000 Ford TS-50. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Ford TS-50 | 1996 Mercedes-Benz F200 | |
| Make | Ford | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | TS-50 | F200 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1989 cc | 5987 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 128 HP | 408 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1208 kg | 1405 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2700 mm |
