2000 Ford TS-50 vs. 1996 Mercedes-Benz G
To start off, 2000 Ford TS-50 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mercedes-Benz G. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mercedes-Benz G would be higher. At 3,199 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Mercedes-Benz G is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Mercedes-Benz G (217 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 89 more horse power than 2000 Ford TS-50. (128 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Mercedes-Benz G should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford TS-50. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Mercedes-Benz G weights approximately 942 kg more than 2000 Ford TS-50. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1996 Mercedes-Benz G is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Ford TS-50. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Mercedes-Benz G will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Mercedes-Benz G (300 Nm) has 125 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford TS-50. (175 Nm). This means 1996 Mercedes-Benz G will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford TS-50.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Ford TS-50 | 1996 Mercedes-Benz G | |
Make | Ford | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | TS-50 | G |
Year Released | 2000 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1989 cc | 3199 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 128 HP | 217 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 175 Nm | 300 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1208 kg | 2150 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2860 mm |