2000 Ford TS-50 vs. 1998 BMW 730
To start off, 2000 Ford TS-50 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 BMW 730. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 BMW 730 would be higher. At 2,793 cc (6 cylinders), 1998 BMW 730 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 BMW 730 (190 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 62 more horse power than 2000 Ford TS-50. (128 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1998 BMW 730 should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford TS-50. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 BMW 730 weights approximately 537 kg more than 2000 Ford TS-50. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 BMW 730 (280 Nm) has 105 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford TS-50. (175 Nm). This means 1998 BMW 730 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford TS-50.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Ford TS-50 | 1998 BMW 730 | |
Make | Ford | BMW |
Model | TS-50 | 730 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1989 cc | 2793 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 128 HP | 190 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5300 RPM |
Torque | 175 Nm | 280 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1208 kg | 1745 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2940 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 90 L |