2000 Ford TS-50 vs. 1998 Oldsmobile SS
To start off, 2000 Ford TS-50 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Oldsmobile SS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Oldsmobile SS would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 1998 Oldsmobile SS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Oldsmobile SS (202 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 74 more horse power than 2000 Ford TS-50. (128 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Oldsmobile SS should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford TS-50.
Because 2000 Ford TS-50 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Ford TS-50. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Oldsmobile SS, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Oldsmobile SS (319 Nm) has 144 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford TS-50. (175 Nm). This means 1998 Oldsmobile SS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford TS-50.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Ford TS-50 | 1998 Oldsmobile SS | |
| Make | Ford | Oldsmobile |
| Model | TS-50 | SS |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1998 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1989 cc | 3791 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 128 HP | 202 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 175 Nm | 319 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
