2000 Ford TS-50 vs. 2000 Daewoo Rezzo
To start off, both 2000 Ford TS-50 and 2000 Daewoo Rezzo were released in the same year (2000). Therefore the support and the availability on parts for both vehicles should be relatively similar. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Daewoo Rezzo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford TS-50 (128 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 9 more horse power than 2000 Daewoo Rezzo. (119 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford TS-50 should accelerate faster than 2000 Daewoo Rezzo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Daewoo Rezzo weights approximately 97 kg more than 2000 Ford TS-50.
Because 2000 Ford TS-50 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Ford TS-50. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Daewoo Rezzo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Daewoo Rezzo (181 Nm) has 6 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford TS-50. (175 Nm). This means 2000 Daewoo Rezzo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford TS-50.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Ford TS-50 | 2000 Daewoo Rezzo | |
| Make | Ford | Daewoo |
| Model | TS-50 | Rezzo |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1989 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 128 HP | 119 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 175 Nm | 181 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1208 kg | 1305 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2610 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 48 L |
