2000 Ford TS-50 vs. 2000 Jeep Grand Cherokee
To start off, both 2000 Ford TS-50 and 2000 Jeep Grand Cherokee were released in the same year (2000). Therefore the support and the availability on parts for both vehicles should be relatively similar. At 3,960 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Jeep Grand Cherokee (195 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 67 more horse power than 2000 Ford TS-50. (128 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Jeep Grand Cherokee should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford TS-50. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Jeep Grand Cherokee weights approximately 508 kg more than 2000 Ford TS-50. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Jeep Grand Cherokee (312 Nm) has 137 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford TS-50. (175 Nm). This means 2000 Jeep Grand Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford TS-50.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Ford TS-50 | 2000 Jeep Grand Cherokee | |
Make | Ford | Jeep |
Model | TS-50 | Grand Cherokee |
Year Released | 2000 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1989 cc | 3960 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 128 HP | 195 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 175 Nm | 312 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1208 kg | 1716 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 78 L |