2000 Ford TS-50 vs. 2002 Ford Econoline
To start off, 2002 Ford Econoline is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford TS-50. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford TS-50 would be higher. At 4,195 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Ford Econoline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Ford Econoline (198 HP @ 4700 RPM) has 70 more horse power than 2000 Ford TS-50. (128 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Ford Econoline should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford TS-50. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Ford Econoline weights approximately 1117 kg more than 2000 Ford TS-50. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Ford Econoline (338 Nm) has 163 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford TS-50. (175 Nm). This means 2002 Ford Econoline will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford TS-50.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Ford TS-50 | 2002 Ford Econoline | |
Make | Ford | Ford |
Model | TS-50 | Econoline |
Year Released | 2000 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1989 cc | 4195 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 128 HP | 198 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4700 RPM |
Torque | 175 Nm | 338 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1208 kg | 2325 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 3510 mm |