2000 Ford TS-50 vs. 2002 Toyota Pod
To start off, 2002 Toyota Pod is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford TS-50. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford TS-50 would be higher. At 1,989 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Ford TS-50 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Toyota Pod (194 HP @ 3400 RPM) has 66 more horse power than 2000 Ford TS-50. (128 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Toyota Pod should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford TS-50. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford TS-50 weights approximately 268 kg more than 2002 Toyota Pod.
Because 2000 Ford TS-50 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Ford TS-50. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Toyota Pod, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Toyota Pod (430 Nm) has 255 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford TS-50. (175 Nm). This means 2002 Toyota Pod will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford TS-50.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Ford TS-50 | 2002 Toyota Pod | |
| Make | Ford | Toyota |
| Model | TS-50 | Pod |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1989 cc | 1495 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 128 HP | 194 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 3400 RPM |
| Torque | 175 Nm | 430 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1208 kg | 940 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2710 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 48 L |
