2000 Ford TS-50 vs. 2003 Holden Rodeo
To start off, 2003 Holden Rodeo is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford TS-50. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford TS-50 would be higher. At 3,494 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Holden Rodeo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Holden Rodeo (145 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 17 more horse power than 2000 Ford TS-50. (128 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Holden Rodeo should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford TS-50.
Because 2003 Holden Rodeo is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Ford TS-50. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Holden Rodeo will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Holden Rodeo (280 Nm) has 105 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford TS-50. (175 Nm). This means 2003 Holden Rodeo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford TS-50. 2000 Ford TS-50 has automatic transmission and 2003 Holden Rodeo has manual transmission. 2003 Holden Rodeo will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Ford TS-50 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Ford TS-50 | 2003 Holden Rodeo | |
Make | Ford | Holden |
Model | TS-50 | Rodeo |
Year Released | 2000 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1989 cc | 3494 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 128 HP | 145 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 175 Nm | 280 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 3060 mm |