2000 Ford TS-50 vs. 2003 Hyundai XG 350
To start off, 2003 Hyundai XG 350 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford TS-50. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford TS-50 would be higher. At 3,497 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Hyundai XG 350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Hyundai XG 350 (194 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 66 more horse power than 2000 Ford TS-50. (128 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Hyundai XG 350 should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford TS-50. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Hyundai XG 350 weights approximately 482 kg more than 2000 Ford TS-50. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2000 Ford TS-50 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Ford TS-50. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Hyundai XG 350, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Hyundai XG 350 (298 Nm) has 123 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford TS-50. (175 Nm). This means 2003 Hyundai XG 350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford TS-50.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Ford TS-50 | 2003 Hyundai XG 350 | |
Make | Ford | Hyundai |
Model | TS-50 | XG 350 |
Year Released | 2000 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1989 cc | 3497 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 128 HP | 194 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 175 Nm | 298 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1208 kg | 1690 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2760 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 65 L |