2000 Ford TS-50 vs. 2003 SsangYong Musso
To start off, 2003 SsangYong Musso is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford TS-50. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford TS-50 would be higher. At 3,199 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 SsangYong Musso is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 SsangYong Musso (217 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 89 more horse power than 2000 Ford TS-50. (128 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 SsangYong Musso should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford TS-50. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 SsangYong Musso weights approximately 698 kg more than 2000 Ford TS-50. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2003 SsangYong Musso is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Ford TS-50. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 SsangYong Musso will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 SsangYong Musso (319 Nm) has 144 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford TS-50. (175 Nm). This means 2003 SsangYong Musso will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford TS-50.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Ford TS-50 | 2003 SsangYong Musso | |
Make | Ford | SsangYong |
Model | TS-50 | Musso |
Year Released | 2000 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1989 cc | 3199 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 128 HP | 217 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 175 Nm | 319 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1208 kg | 1906 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2640 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 73 L |