2000 Ford TS-50 vs. 2003 Subaru R2

To start off, 2003 Subaru R2 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford TS-50. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford TS-50 would be higher. At 1,989 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Ford TS-50 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford TS-50 (128 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 76 more horse power than 2003 Subaru R2. (52 HP @ 6400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford TS-50 should accelerate faster than 2003 Subaru R2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford TS-50 weights approximately 388 kg more than 2003 Subaru R2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2003 Subaru R2 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Ford TS-50. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Subaru R2 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford TS-50 (175 Nm) has 111 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Subaru R2. (64 Nm). This means 2000 Ford TS-50 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Subaru R2. 2000 Ford TS-50 has automatic transmission and 2003 Subaru R2 has manual transmission. 2003 Subaru R2 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Ford TS-50 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: