2000 Ford TS-50 vs. 2004 Honda Pilot
To start off, 2004 Honda Pilot is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford TS-50. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford TS-50 would be higher. At 3,474 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Honda Pilot is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Honda Pilot (240 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 112 more horse power than 2000 Ford TS-50. (128 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Honda Pilot should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford TS-50. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford TS-50 weights approximately 94 kg more than 2004 Honda Pilot.
Because 2000 Ford TS-50 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Ford TS-50. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Honda Pilot, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Honda Pilot (328 Nm) has 153 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford TS-50. (175 Nm). This means 2004 Honda Pilot will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford TS-50.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Ford TS-50 | 2004 Honda Pilot | |
| Make | Ford | Honda |
| Model | TS-50 | Pilot |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1989 cc | 3474 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 128 HP | 240 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 175 Nm | 328 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1208 kg | 1114 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2710 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 73 L |
