2000 Ford TS-50 vs. 2004 Subaru Outback
To start off, 2004 Subaru Outback is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford TS-50. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford TS-50 would be higher. At 2,457 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Subaru Outback is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Subaru Outback (165 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 37 more horse power than 2000 Ford TS-50. (128 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Subaru Outback should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford TS-50. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Subaru Outback weights approximately 348 kg more than 2000 Ford TS-50. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Subaru Outback is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Ford TS-50. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Subaru Outback will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Subaru Outback (225 Nm) has 50 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford TS-50. (175 Nm). This means 2004 Subaru Outback will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford TS-50.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Ford TS-50 | 2004 Subaru Outback | |
| Make | Ford | Subaru |
| Model | TS-50 | Outback |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1989 cc | 2457 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | boxer |
| Horse Power | 128 HP | 165 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 175 Nm | 225 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1208 kg | 1556 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2660 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 64 L |
