2000 Ford TS-50 vs. 2005 GMC Safari
To start off, 2005 GMC Safari is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford TS-50. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford TS-50 would be higher. At 4,294 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 GMC Safari is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 GMC Safari (190 HP) has 62 more horse power than 2000 Ford TS-50. (128 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2005 GMC Safari should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford TS-50. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 GMC Safari weights approximately 833 kg more than 2000 Ford TS-50. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 GMC Safari is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Ford TS-50. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 GMC Safari will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 GMC Safari (339 Nm) has 164 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford TS-50. (175 Nm). This means 2005 GMC Safari will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford TS-50.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Ford TS-50 | 2005 GMC Safari | |
Make | Ford | GMC |
Model | TS-50 | Safari |
Year Released | 2000 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1989 cc | 4294 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 128 HP | 190 HP |
Torque | 175 Nm | 339 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1208 kg | 2041 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2830 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 102 L |