2000 Ford TS-50 vs. 2005 Saturn L
To start off, 2005 Saturn L is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford TS-50. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford TS-50 would be higher. At 2,999 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Saturn L is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Saturn L (182 HP) has 54 more horse power than 2000 Ford TS-50. (128 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Saturn L should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford TS-50. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Saturn L weights approximately 260 kg more than 2000 Ford TS-50. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2000 Ford TS-50 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Ford TS-50. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Saturn L, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Saturn L (258 Nm) has 83 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford TS-50. (175 Nm). This means 2005 Saturn L will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford TS-50.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Ford TS-50 | 2005 Saturn L | |
| Make | Ford | Saturn |
| Model | TS-50 | L |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1989 cc | 2999 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 128 HP | 182 HP |
| Torque | 175 Nm | 258 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1208 kg | 1468 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2710 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 59 L |
