2000 Ford TS-50 vs. 2006 GMC Sierra
To start off, 2006 GMC Sierra is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford TS-50. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford TS-50 would be higher. At 5,965 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 GMC Sierra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 GMC Sierra (300 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 172 more horse power than 2000 Ford TS-50. (128 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 GMC Sierra should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford TS-50. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 GMC Sierra weights approximately 1405 kg more than 2000 Ford TS-50. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 GMC Sierra is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Ford TS-50. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 GMC Sierra will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 GMC Sierra (489 Nm) has 314 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford TS-50. (175 Nm). This means 2006 GMC Sierra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford TS-50.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Ford TS-50 | 2006 GMC Sierra | |
Make | Ford | GMC |
Model | TS-50 | Sierra |
Year Released | 2000 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1989 cc | 5965 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 128 HP | 300 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Torque | 175 Nm | 489 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1208 kg | 2613 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 4250 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 129 L |