2000 Ford TS-50 vs. 2006 Mitsubishi Pajero
To start off, 2006 Mitsubishi Pajero is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford TS-50. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford TS-50 would be higher. At 3,828 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Mitsubishi Pajero is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mitsubishi Pajero (201 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 73 more horse power than 2000 Ford TS-50. (128 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mitsubishi Pajero should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford TS-50.
Because 2006 Mitsubishi Pajero is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Ford TS-50. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Mitsubishi Pajero will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mitsubishi Pajero (314 Nm) has 139 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford TS-50. (175 Nm). This means 2006 Mitsubishi Pajero will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford TS-50.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Ford TS-50 | 2006 Mitsubishi Pajero | |
Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
Model | TS-50 | Pajero |
Year Released | 2000 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1989 cc | 3828 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 128 HP | 201 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 175 Nm | 314 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2790 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 90 L |