2000 Ford TS-50 vs. 2008 Mazda B2300
To start off, 2008 Mazda B2300 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford TS-50. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford TS-50 would be higher. At 2,266 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Mazda B2300 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Mazda B2300 (144 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 16 more horse power than 2000 Ford TS-50. (128 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Mazda B2300 should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford TS-50.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Mazda B2300 (209 Nm) has 34 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford TS-50. (175 Nm). This means 2008 Mazda B2300 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford TS-50. 2000 Ford TS-50 has automatic transmission and 2008 Mazda B2300 has manual transmission. 2008 Mazda B2300 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Ford TS-50 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Ford TS-50 | 2008 Mazda B2300 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | TS-50 | B2300 |
Year Released | 2000 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1989 cc | 2266 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 128 HP | 144 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 175 Nm | 209 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2840 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 62 L |