2000 Ford TS-50 vs. 2008 Nissan Terrano
To start off, 2008 Nissan Terrano is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford TS-50. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford TS-50 would be higher. At 2,664 cc, 2008 Nissan Terrano is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Nissan Terrano weights approximately 612 kg more than 2000 Ford TS-50.
Because 2008 Nissan Terrano is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Ford TS-50. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Nissan Terrano will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Nissan Terrano (279 Nm) has 104 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford TS-50. (175 Nm). This means 2008 Nissan Terrano will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford TS-50. 2000 Ford TS-50 has automatic transmission and 2008 Nissan Terrano has manual transmission. 2008 Nissan Terrano will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Ford TS-50 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Ford TS-50 | 2008 Nissan Terrano | |
| Make | Ford | Nissan |
| Model | TS-50 | Terrano |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1989 cc | 2664 cc |
| Horse Power | 128 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 175 Nm | 279 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1208 kg | 1820 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2460 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 72 L |
