2000 Ford TS-50 vs. 2009 Honda Odyssey
To start off, 2009 Honda Odyssey is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford TS-50. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford TS-50 would be higher. At 3,471 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Honda Odyssey is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Honda Odyssey (242 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 114 more horse power than 2000 Ford TS-50. (128 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Honda Odyssey should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford TS-50. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford TS-50 weights approximately 79 kg more than 2009 Honda Odyssey.
Because 2000 Ford TS-50 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Ford TS-50. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Honda Odyssey, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Honda Odyssey (240 Nm) has 65 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford TS-50. (175 Nm). This means 2009 Honda Odyssey will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford TS-50.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Ford TS-50 | 2009 Honda Odyssey | |
Make | Ford | Honda |
Model | TS-50 | Odyssey |
Year Released | 2000 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1989 cc | 3471 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 128 HP | 242 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5750 RPM |
Torque | 175 Nm | 240 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1208 kg | 1129 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 3010 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 79 L |