2000 Ford TS-50 vs. 2009 Lexus LS
To start off, 2009 Lexus LS is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford TS-50. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford TS-50 would be higher. At 4,293 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Lexus LS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Lexus LS (280 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 152 more horse power than 2000 Ford TS-50. (128 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Lexus LS should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford TS-50. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Lexus LS weights approximately 632 kg more than 2000 Ford TS-50. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Lexus LS (417 Nm) has 242 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford TS-50. (175 Nm). This means 2009 Lexus LS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford TS-50.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Ford TS-50 | 2009 Lexus LS | |
| Make | Ford | Lexus |
| Model | TS-50 | LS |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1989 cc | 4293 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 128 HP | 280 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 175 Nm | 417 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1208 kg | 1840 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2930 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 84 L |
