2000 Ford TS-50 vs. 2010 Maybach 62
To start off, 2010 Maybach 62 is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford TS-50. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford TS-50 would be higher. At 6,000 cc (12 cylinders), 2010 Maybach 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Maybach 62 (604 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 476 more horse power than 2000 Ford TS-50. (128 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Maybach 62 should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford TS-50. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Maybach 62 weights approximately 1668 kg more than 2000 Ford TS-50. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Maybach 62 (999 Nm) has 824 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford TS-50. (175 Nm). This means 2010 Maybach 62 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford TS-50.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Ford TS-50 | 2010 Maybach 62 | |
Make | Ford | Maybach |
Model | TS-50 | 62 |
Year Released | 2000 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1989 cc | 6000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 128 HP | 604 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 175 Nm | 999 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1208 kg | 2876 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 3828 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 110 L |