2000 Ford TS-50 vs. 2010 Volvo S60
To start off, 2010 Volvo S60 is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford TS-50. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford TS-50 would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Volvo S60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Volvo S60 (300 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 172 more horse power than 2000 Ford TS-50. (128 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Volvo S60 should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford TS-50. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Volvo S60 weights approximately 561 kg more than 2000 Ford TS-50. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2010 Volvo S60 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Ford TS-50. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Volvo S60 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Volvo S60 (440 Nm) has 265 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford TS-50. (175 Nm). This means 2010 Volvo S60 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford TS-50.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Ford TS-50 | 2010 Volvo S60 | |
Make | Ford | Volvo |
Model | TS-50 | S60 |
Year Released | 2000 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1989 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 128 HP | 300 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 175 Nm | 440 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1208 kg | 1769 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2776 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 67 L |