2000 Ford TS-50 vs. 2011 Dodge Dakota
To start off, 2011 Dodge Dakota is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford TS-50. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford TS-50 would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Dodge Dakota is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Dodge Dakota (210 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 82 more horse power than 2000 Ford TS-50. (128 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Dodge Dakota should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford TS-50. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Dodge Dakota weights approximately 752 kg more than 2000 Ford TS-50. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2011 Dodge Dakota is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Ford TS-50. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Dodge Dakota will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Dodge Dakota (319 Nm) has 144 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford TS-50. (175 Nm). This means 2011 Dodge Dakota will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford TS-50.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Ford TS-50 | 2011 Dodge Dakota | |
Make | Ford | Dodge |
Model | TS-50 | Dakota |
Year Released | 2000 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1989 cc | 3700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 128 HP | 210 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 175 Nm | 319 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1208 kg | 1960 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 3340 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 83 L |