2000 Ford TS-50 vs. 2011 Ford F-250
To start off, 2011 Ford F-250 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford TS-50. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford TS-50 would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2011 Ford F-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Ford F-250 (385 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 257 more horse power than 2000 Ford TS-50. (128 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Ford F-250 should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford TS-50.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Ford F-250 (548 Nm) has 373 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford TS-50. (175 Nm). This means 2011 Ford F-250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford TS-50.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Ford TS-50 | 2011 Ford F-250 | |
Make | Ford | Ford |
Model | TS-50 | F-250 |
Year Released | 2000 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1989 cc | 6200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 128 HP | 385 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 175 Nm | 548 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 3967 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 132 L |