2000 Ford TS-50 vs. 2011 Nissan Juke
To start off, 2011 Nissan Juke is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford TS-50. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford TS-50 would be higher. At 1,989 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Ford TS-50 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Nissan Juke (188 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 60 more horse power than 2000 Ford TS-50. (128 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Nissan Juke should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford TS-50. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Nissan Juke weights approximately 126 kg more than 2000 Ford TS-50. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2011 Nissan Juke is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Ford TS-50. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Nissan Juke will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Nissan Juke (240 Nm) has 65 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford TS-50. (175 Nm). This means 2011 Nissan Juke will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford TS-50.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Ford TS-50 | 2011 Nissan Juke | |
| Make | Ford | Nissan |
| Model | TS-50 | Juke |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1989 cc | 1600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 128 HP | 188 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 175 Nm | 240 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | CVT |
| Vehicle Weight | 1208 kg | 1334 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2530 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 50 L |
