2000 Ford TS-50 vs. 2011 Renault Fluence
To start off, 2011 Renault Fluence is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford TS-50. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford TS-50 would be higher. At 1,989 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Ford TS-50 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford TS-50 (128 HP) has 18 more horse power than 2011 Renault Fluence. (110 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford TS-50 should accelerate faster than 2011 Renault Fluence. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Renault Fluence weights approximately 17 kg more than 2000 Ford TS-50.
Because 2000 Ford TS-50 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Ford TS-50. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Renault Fluence, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2000 Ford TS-50 has automatic transmission and 2011 Renault Fluence has manual transmission. 2011 Renault Fluence will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Ford TS-50 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Ford TS-50 | 2011 Renault Fluence | |
Make | Ford | Renault |
Model | TS-50 | Fluence |
Year Released | 2000 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1989 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 128 HP | 110 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1208 kg | 1225 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2702 mm |