2000 Ford TS-50 vs. 2011 Renault Laguna
To start off, 2011 Renault Laguna is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford TS-50. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford TS-50 would be higher. At 2,946 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Renault Laguna is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Renault Laguna (204 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 76 more horse power than 2000 Ford TS-50. (128 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Renault Laguna should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford TS-50.
Because 2000 Ford TS-50 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Ford TS-50. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Renault Laguna, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Renault Laguna (285 Nm) has 110 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford TS-50. (175 Nm). This means 2011 Renault Laguna will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford TS-50.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Ford TS-50 | 2011 Renault Laguna | |
Make | Ford | Renault |
Model | TS-50 | Laguna |
Year Released | 2000 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1989 cc | 2946 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 128 HP | 204 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 175 Nm | 285 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2750 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 70 L |