2000 Ford TS-50 vs. 2012 BMW 335
To start off, 2012 BMW 335 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford TS-50. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford TS-50 would be higher. At 2,993 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 BMW 335 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 BMW 335 (311 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 183 more horse power than 2000 Ford TS-50. (128 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 BMW 335 should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford TS-50.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 BMW 335 (600 Nm) has 425 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford TS-50. (175 Nm). This means 2012 BMW 335 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford TS-50. 2000 Ford TS-50 has automatic transmission and 2012 BMW 335 has manual transmission. 2012 BMW 335 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Ford TS-50 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Ford TS-50 | 2012 BMW 335 | |
Make | Ford | BMW |
Model | TS-50 | 335 |
Year Released | 2000 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1989 cc | 2993 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 128 HP | 311 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Torque | 175 Nm | 600 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed manual |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2810 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 57 L |