2000 Ford TS-50 vs. 2013 Ford E-Series
To start off, 2013 Ford E-Series is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford TS-50. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford TS-50 would be higher. At 5,400 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Ford E-Series is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Ford E-Series (252 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 124 more horse power than 2000 Ford TS-50. (128 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Ford E-Series should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford TS-50. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Ford E-Series weights approximately 1622 kg more than 2000 Ford TS-50. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Ford E-Series (474 Nm) has 299 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford TS-50. (175 Nm). This means 2013 Ford E-Series will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford TS-50.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Ford TS-50 | 2013 Ford E-Series | |
Make | Ford | Ford |
Model | TS-50 | E-Series |
Year Released | 2000 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1989 cc | 5400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 128 HP | 252 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 175 Nm | 474 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 4-speed automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1208 kg | 2830 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 3505 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 150 L |