2000 Ford TS-50 vs. 2013 Jeep Compass

To start off, 2013 Jeep Compass is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford TS-50. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford TS-50 would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Jeep Compass is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Jeep Compass (170 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 42 more horse power than 2000 Ford TS-50. (128 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Jeep Compass should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford TS-50. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Jeep Compass weights approximately 241 kg more than 2000 Ford TS-50. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2000 Ford TS-50 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Ford TS-50. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Jeep Compass, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Jeep Compass (224 Nm) has 49 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford TS-50. (175 Nm). This means 2013 Jeep Compass will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford TS-50.

Compare all specifications: