2000 GAZ 3110 vs. 2003 Lotec C 1000
To start off, 2003 Lotec C 1000 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 GAZ 3110. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 GAZ 3110 would be higher. At 5,499 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Lotec C 1000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Lotec C 1000 (843 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 709 more horse power than 2000 GAZ 3110. (134 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Lotec C 1000 should accelerate faster than 2000 GAZ 3110. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 GAZ 3110 weights approximately 320 kg more than 2003 Lotec C 1000.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Lotec C 1000 (990 Nm @ 3900 RPM) has 801 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 GAZ 3110. (189 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2003 Lotec C 1000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 GAZ 3110.
Compare all specifications:
2000 GAZ 3110 | 2003 Lotec C 1000 | |
Make | GAZ | Lotec |
Model | 3110 | C 1000 |
Year Released | 2000 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 1996 cc | 5499 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 134 HP | 843 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 189 Nm | 990 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3900 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1400 kg | 1080 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 2010 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1150 mm |