2000 GAZ 3111 vs. 1968 Triumph 2.5
To start off, 2000 GAZ 3111 is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Triumph 2.5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Triumph 2.5 would be higher. At 2,498 cc (6 cylinders), 1968 Triumph 2.5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Triumph 2.5 (150 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 2 more horse power than 2000 GAZ 3111. (148 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1968 Triumph 2.5 should accelerate faster than 2000 GAZ 3111. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 GAZ 3111 weights approximately 367 kg more than 1968 Triumph 2.5.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1968 Triumph 2.5 (222 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 6 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 GAZ 3111. (216 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1968 Triumph 2.5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 GAZ 3111.
Compare all specifications:
2000 GAZ 3111 | 1968 Triumph 2.5 | |
Make | GAZ | Triumph |
Model | 3111 | 2.5 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2287 cc | 2498 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 150 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 216 Nm | 222 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 92 mm | 74.7 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86 mm | 95 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1500 kg | 1133 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4950 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1660 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 2700 mm |