2000 GMC Jimmy vs. 1962 Jeep CJ5
To start off, 2000 GMC Jimmy is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Jeep CJ5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Jeep CJ5 would be higher. At 4,298 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 GMC Jimmy is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 GMC Jimmy (190 HP) has 131 more horse power than 1962 Jeep CJ5. (59 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 GMC Jimmy should accelerate faster than 1962 Jeep CJ5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 GMC Jimmy weights approximately 925 kg more than 1962 Jeep CJ5. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1962 Jeep CJ5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 GMC Jimmy. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1962 Jeep CJ5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 GMC Jimmy (340 Nm) has 195 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Jeep CJ5. (145 Nm). This means 2000 GMC Jimmy will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Jeep CJ5.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 GMC Jimmy | 1962 Jeep CJ5 | |
| Make | GMC | Jeep |
| Model | Jimmy | CJ5 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1962 |
| Body Type | SUV | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4298 cc | 2199 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 190 HP | 59 HP |
| Torque | 340 Nm | 145 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1955 kg | 1030 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 3520 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1710 mm | 1740 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2060 mm |
